Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
About Literature / Hobbyist Member EnuoCaleUnited States Groups :icondarel-phiforumclub: DARel-PhiForumClub
Those who ride the Megiddo Ark..
Recent Activity
Deviant for 8 Years
Needs Premium Membership
Statistics 154 Deviations 2,347 Comments 28,169 Pageviews

Newest Deviations

Watchers

Friends

Groups

Activity


One common trend among the more dawkins-jerking atheists who really like talking about how smart they think they are, but without having much to show for it is insisting that many religious people's beliefs are based on a really keen desire to not have to face death which "obviously" should be viewed as a conclusion to "your" existence. And so beliefs in an afterlife just express a hope for something they want to be true, but have little evidence for. Which admittedly is not that necessarily incorrect of a claim many times.

However, the problem here seems to be that these same atheists are insinuating that they personally don't do this. Which isn't true.

The main issue here seems to be that atheists intuitively assume/hope that they have some kind of substantive self that persists over time, but which ends at death. They seem fine accepting that death is the end, but not actually facing the real ramifications of lack of substance dualism. Or the fact that without design, their intuitive assumption that this is true is based on nothing.

Nothing in the physical world hints that there's a persisting self at all, much less one that is fundamentally the same being for the entirety of its existence. Biological appeals have to face the fact that not only does their matter get cycled out, but that they don't even inherently qualify different frames of consciousness as being one ontologically single being, nor is there any reason to assume they should. Psychological ones have to face that their process can be duplicated in ways that even the people claiming them admit would have trouble being defined as a singular entity. And likewise, there's little to even hint that thoughts are a fundamentally continuous linked stream, much less that if they were it was evidence that it was an ontologically single entity. 

People can occasionally half admit this, but almost always scramble to find ways to not have to actually accept the ramifications. That most of these same people can't even vaguely cobble together a meaningful argument for long term persistence of a singular mind, and that they believe in some form of it because, like religious people, they're just hoping that something they have an easier time accepting is the case. And when they are faced with this, the knee jerk assumption is never one of acceptance, but always "but that must be wrong because I strongly feel like it should be, and for reasons I can't state" or at absolute best someone who pretends to accept it, but still obviously lives under the assumption that its wrong.

The question then is, what's the point of acting like its some gross level of misplaced optimism to want to persist in some cases its unlikely when one is just going to turn around and do the same thing in others. Especially noting that for various reasons, if a persisting self did exist, it would hint at possible ways it could beyond death as well.
I know that the y40 is better for games, and not that different price-wise. But I also hear that its touch-pad is particularly bad, enough that if you have to use it often it makes it practically unusable. And I'm going to need to use it that way rather often. Not being as good for gaming isn't a huge issue for me.

The closest others I've looked at as an alternative are the Dell Inspiron i5447-6250sLV 14-Inc, and Acer Aspire V5 473P-5602. Most of the things people list as negatives for the z40 aren't a huge deal to me in general, such as no touchscreen and battery that could be longer.

I also hear the acer aspire e5 is reasonable, and sometimes compared to z40. The e5 looks a bit heavier and clunkier though.

deviantID

EnuoCale

Artist | Hobbyist | Literature
United States
Well, I guess this is where I'll put my more important book-related things. For the time being, they'll be divided by chapter names, or whatever; since the whole thing doesn't have a title yet. Also, some of them are kind of like drafts. I'll fix them once I'm actually good at writing.

enuocale.deviantart.com/galler…

Note. This is all in the order it's supposed to come in. However, there are obviously big gaps in-between, for parts that haven't been written yet.
Interests

Donate

EnuoCale has started a donation pool!
155 / 1,300,000
Mostly these will end up for the group.

You must be logged in to donate.
  • :iconmagnius159:
    Magnius159
    Donated Dec 7, 2011, 5:30:00 AM
    20
  • :iconkalypher:
    Kalypher
    Donated Dec 2, 2011, 12:21:35 AM
    100
  • :icondezenerate:
    Dezenerate
    Donated Aug 20, 2011, 10:18:50 AM
    5
  • :iconlynneblue:
    Lynneblue
    Donated Jan 16, 2011, 12:40:20 AM
    7
  • :iconisa-lacrymosa:
    Isa-Lacrymosa
    Donated Jan 12, 2011, 7:51:07 PM
    2
  • :iconlucid-death:
    Lucid-death
    Donated Nov 6, 2010, 3:00:28 PM
    20
  • :iconqueen-of-disturbia:
    Queen-of-Disturbia
    Donated Nov 1, 2010, 1:04:41 AM
    1

AdCast - Ads from the Community

×

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:icontheirolia:
THEIROLIA Featured By Owner Nov 23, 2014  New member Hobbyist Writer
Thanks for the llama!!
Reply
:iconskulkey:
skulkey Featured By Owner Jul 6, 2014  Professional Digital Artist
grah, they closed that thread.  here's my response:

it's in part why people have so much difficulty understanding the trinity (you see atheists asking questions about it a lot, because they're going on christian descriptions of it), and why the holy spirit (often translated "holy ghost")  is rarely mentioned, let alone understood. people tend toward the profane and prosaic, regardless of worldview, really.  shit, it's why the infinite is so misunderstood.  people want to subdivide it into chunks they can understand (which will always leave you with an undefined "chunk", but that's neither here nor there...). even scientists or philosophers that work with it often fall back on equations or logic to put it into relate-able terms.  but it's always undefined, essentially.  there is no way to put it into human terms except by metaphor or allegory, and even then they more often than not fall short.

hah, i was just reminded of how even christians, who claim knowledge of the infinite in terms of their god, so very frequently fail at understanding an infinite universe (they always want to know "what happened before?".  before the big bang, before the universe, before before before.  until at last they conclude "god must have been before, and started it all - completely failing right there, as they answered one infinite question with an infinite answer).  so to them, their god is both discrete (understandable) and infinite (completely misunderstood).

so what are we left with?  gnosis, as far as i can tell.  there's really no other way.  apprehension of the discrete is a failure (and really that's what our brains are designed to do).
Reply
:iconenuocale:
EnuoCale Featured By Owner Jul 6, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
I don't get why the trinity confuses people anyways. Its not that complicated to envision one thing that has three minds.

However, hopefully I can be useful on that front. I started making compressed study guides for each individual general area of philosophy with descriptions in as simple and straightforward of language as possible, that are expressed as simply as possible. Originally, I started working on them in part for me, to make sure I knew all the important aspects for subjects that I didn't know about yet on at least a surface level, in part for :iconwhatonearth: since she's far too lazy to actually learn everything the long way, and in part to make sure that anyone I needed to be could be reasonably acquainted with most topics. But once I started actually making them, I realized that this simple and straightforward of study guides don't really exist anywhere I know of on the internet, and so these are actually fairly valuable to get out. I shared my first one with /smtg/, but nothing beyond that.

Of course I could hold on to them. Once I finish deciding whether I'm going to make a new religion or abstract "movement" / group / whatever I'm doing, maybe I could put them on my site to make it something that people are more likely to come to in general. If I have a large number of study guides by then, it'll artificially be a traffic generator and conduit for my teachings to get out. Oho. :ninjaplot:
Reply
:iconmastemaplz:
mastemaplz Featured By Owner May 11, 2014
holla holla get macca
Reply
:iconenuocale:
EnuoCale Featured By Owner May 13, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
>There are people right now who are legitimately frat boy autistic libertarian chaos aligned gaians.
Reply
:iconmalintra-shadowmoon:
Malintra-Shadowmoon Featured By Owner Jan 23, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Thanks so much for paying a visit to :iconthewayofloveandlight: :heart:
Reply
:iconenuocale:
EnuoCale Featured By Owner Jan 26, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
 was trying to see if I could find a way to send my own affiliation request. Since the one sent to us claims it needs three votes, and I'm pretty sure that there aren't three active moderators anymore. I could if you make them able to be sent to you and then tell me.
Reply
:iconmalintra-shadowmoon:
Malintra-Shadowmoon Featured By Owner Jan 27, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
I have already received affiliation requests, so I know that it will work when you send one own to my group.
I would be very glad about it :)
Reply
:iconenuocale:
EnuoCale Featured By Owner Jan 30, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
If you want to know the secret to making a big group, you have to go to the members list of other groups you'd think the type of people in would join and send invites to as many of them as you can. Once you max out invites, wait a few days before deleting those ones and replacing them with new invites.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconaqart2:
AQart2 Featured By Owner Aug 26, 2013  Professional General Artist
Hey thanks for tha fave bro;)
Reply
Add a Comment: